<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EF 70-200mm F/2.8L IS USM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stateless.geek.nz/2004/07/15/canon-ef-70-200mm-f28l-is-usm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stateless.geek.nz/2004/07/15/canon-ef-70-200mm-f28l-is-usm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:02:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Lee</title>
		<link>http://stateless.geek.nz/2004/07/15/canon-ef-70-200mm-f28l-is-usm/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 01:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stateless.geek.nz/2004/07/15/canon-ef-70-200mm-f28l-is-usm/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I you are willing to invest in a 70-200/2.8L I suggest you take you digital camera down to the store and try the various lens.  Go home and compare.  For instance I got a Tamron SP 28-75mm F/2.8 XR, because I from the image quality quality to very good compared to the similar canon. The price was certainly very good.

However, the 70-200mm f/2.8L is definitely a very nice lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I you are willing to invest in a 70-200/2.8L I suggest you take you digital camera down to the store and try the various lens.  Go home and compare.  For instance I got a Tamron SP 28-75mm F/2.8 XR, because I from the image quality quality to very good compared to the similar canon. The price was certainly very good.</p>
<p>However, the 70-200mm f/2.8L is definitely a very nice lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Snellgrove</title>
		<link>http://stateless.geek.nz/2004/07/15/canon-ef-70-200mm-f28l-is-usm/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Snellgrove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stateless.geek.nz/2004/07/15/canon-ef-70-200mm-f28l-is-usm/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU FOR TAKING THESE SHOTS, I 
WAS LOOKING AT BUYING THE NEW 70-300 CANON LENS, BUT NOW 
AFTER SEEING THESE RESULTS, I AM GOING TO FIND A WAY TO
BUY THE EF 70-200MM F2.8L IS USM LENS.  OTHER PEOPLE
HAVE SAID AFTER A FEW MONTH YOU FORGET ABOUT THE COST
YOU HAVE JUST PAID OUT FOR THE EXPENSIVE LENS.  SO AGAIN
I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU FOR HELPING ME DECIDE
WHAT TO DO!!!! SHARON</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU FOR TAKING THESE SHOTS, I<br />
WAS LOOKING AT BUYING THE NEW 70-300 CANON LENS, BUT NOW<br />
AFTER SEEING THESE RESULTS, I AM GOING TO FIND A WAY TO<br />
BUY THE EF 70-200MM F2.8L IS USM LENS.  OTHER PEOPLE<br />
HAVE SAID AFTER A FEW MONTH YOU FORGET ABOUT THE COST<br />
YOU HAVE JUST PAID OUT FOR THE EXPENSIVE LENS.  SO AGAIN<br />
I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU FOR HELPING ME DECIDE<br />
WHAT TO DO!!!! SHARON</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

