<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remote desktop faster than Local</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stateless.geek.nz/2005/07/18/remote-desktop-faster-than-local/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stateless.geek.nz/2005/07/18/remote-desktop-faster-than-local/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 07:26:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Parry</title>
		<link>http://stateless.geek.nz/2005/07/18/remote-desktop-faster-than-local/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Parry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 03:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stateless.geek.nz/2005/07/18/remote-desktop-faster-than-local/#comment-316</guid>
		<description>The question has to be, what&#039;s the overhead (CPU wise) on these transactions?  In a small environment it may make sense to use this sort of technology - but if you could convince poeple that it was faster in a huge multi-user-per-machine environment it&#039;d be the shizzle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question has to be, what&#8217;s the overhead (CPU wise) on these transactions?  In a small environment it may make sense to use this sort of technology &#8211; but if you could convince poeple that it was faster in a huge multi-user-per-machine environment it&#8217;d be the shizzle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

