<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standards New Zealand meeting on Office Open XML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stateless.geek.nz/2007/08/17/standards-new-zealand-meeting-on-office-open-xml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stateless.geek.nz/2007/08/17/standards-new-zealand-meeting-on-office-open-xml/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 03:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Parry</title>
		<link>http://stateless.geek.nz/2007/08/17/standards-new-zealand-meeting-on-office-open-xml/comment-page-1/#comment-2046</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Parry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stateless.geek.nz/2007/08/17/standards-new-zealand-meeting-on-office-open-xml/#comment-2046</guid>
		<description>The question is, will you recommend OOXML or what?  I mean, you&#039;re probably going to recommend Open Office&#039;s XML standard, rather than Microsoft&#039;s, but the decision should probably be around which is the better standard :)

I&#039;ve done quite a bit of looking into this for government, it&#039;s a thorny issue.  From a government issue side of things the most important thing is that the documents have an open, self describing standard and both comply to that.  

Good luck :)  But I suspect that Standards NZ would be committing veritable suicide to suggest that Microsoft&#039;s version wasn&#039;t a standard in some way, because regardless of what they think the world will use it anyway.  The good news is that, unlike .doc, this one&#039;s actually open in that it&#039;s got a published standard and a self describing format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, will you recommend OOXML or what?  I mean, you&#8217;re probably going to recommend Open Office&#8217;s XML standard, rather than Microsoft&#8217;s, but the decision should probably be around which is the better standard <img src='http://stateless.geek.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done quite a bit of looking into this for government, it&#8217;s a thorny issue.  From a government issue side of things the most important thing is that the documents have an open, self describing standard and both comply to that.  </p>
<p>Good luck <img src='http://stateless.geek.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   But I suspect that Standards NZ would be committing veritable suicide to suggest that Microsoft&#8217;s version wasn&#8217;t a standard in some way, because regardless of what they think the world will use it anyway.  The good news is that, unlike .doc, this one&#8217;s actually open in that it&#8217;s got a published standard and a self describing format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
