<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Somewhere out there! &#187; chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stateless.geek.nz/tag/chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stateless.geek.nz</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:03:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Chrome</title>
		<link>http://stateless.geek.nz/2008/09/03/chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://stateless.geek.nz/2008/09/03/chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stateless.geek.nz/?p=572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been playing around with Chrome from Google for a short while and what I&#8217;ve seen so far I like.
Best feature to me so far is the seperate memory spaces for each tab &#8211; I actually like this idea.  Firefox is a real PITA when it comes to memory. Especially on a laptop with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been playing around with <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Chrome</a> from Google for a short while and what I&#8217;ve seen so far I like.</p>
<p>Best feature to me so far is the seperate memory spaces for each tab &#8211; I actually like this idea.  Firefox is a real PITA when it comes to memory. Especially on a laptop with long running firefox processes, and being able to kill a tab and see the memory completely go is good.  I&#8217;m not sure how exactly Chrome works &#8211; but if the application code is cached and only the data specific to each tab is in separate process and memory space then it is probably efficient enough.</p>
<p>It will be interesting when more of the plugins from Firefox get portable or written for Chrome. I&#8217;d also like to see a portable version.</p>
<p>Check out the <a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/">Chrome Book</a> at Google Books &#8211; has some useful information.</p>
<p>For now I think I will be using Chrome and Firefox together. Chrome is definitely a very good replacement for Prism which still suffers from Firefox issues.  Running Gmail in Chrome with <a href="http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95710&#038;hl=en">application shortcuts</a> is very easy. And the method is uses to load links from Gmail and GReader in the main window is very cool. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stateless.geek.nz/2008/09/03/chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
