linux-image-virtual with ESX
According to this thread, if you need to use the linux-image-virtual package on ubuntu then it only supports the “bus logic” scsi controller with ESX.
Permalink Comments off
According to this thread, if you need to use the linux-image-virtual package on ubuntu then it only supports the “bus logic” scsi controller with ESX.
Permalink Comments off
Need to access the ESX console with the Virtual Infrastructure Client in some remote location where your VPN does not work. Forward ports 443, 902 and 903 with putty. Port specifics for ESX can be found on page 179 of the ESX Server Config guide.
In my case I additionally need to forward from a boundary machine:
ssh -L 8443:localhost:443 -L 8902:localhost:902 -L 8903:localhost:903 node2
I was trying a Windows Live game on Steam yesterday and got the above error. After a lot of googling I discovered that I needed to install Game for Windows Live. There is version 1.2 and 2.0. Once this were installed the game run correctly.
Permalink Comments off
I tried several methods last night including Unetbootin, and this is the one that worked best.
Basically copy the ISO on the USB root directory, add vmlinuz and initrd.gz from main/installer-i386/current/images/hd-media/. Then add syslinux.cfg with:
default vmlinuz append initrd=initrd.gz
If you have boot problems you might also need to run install-mbr /dev/sda from the mbr package.
I keep smacking into this issue. So a couple notes to myself for future reference.
Before install touch /etc/inittab and afterwards add this to /etc/event.d/svscan:
start on runlevel 3 start on runlevel 4 start on runlevel 5 stop on runlevel 0 stop on runlevel 1 stop on runlevel 6 respawn exec /usr/bin/svscanboot
Permalink Comments off
A few useful vim indenting links:
This is the most useful bit when pasting into a vim window.
nnoremap :set invpaste paste?
imap
set pastetoggle=
Permalink Comments off
Lanuchy is a quicksilver-like key stroke application lanucher for linux and windows. Very cool.
Permalink Comments off
Windows* client CIFS behavior can slow Linux* NAS performance:-
We have compared the performance of Windows* and Linux*-based CIFS* (Samba*) servers for digital media applications and found that the ext3*-based Linux server’s throughput was up to 53% lower than the Windows server’s–although both used identical hardware (Figure 1). An XFS*-based Linux server had roughly the same performance as the Windows server. Our investigation shows that the difference lies in the filesystem allocation and handling of sparse files. In particular, the Windows client makes an assumption that the CIFS fileserver uses NTFS*, a filesystem that assumes files will be data-full (not sparse). This contradicts a fundamental assumption of ext3–that files are sparse–and leads to fragmentation of files and degraded performance on ext3. Further, we’ve seen this behavior manifested for a broad range of media applications including iTunes*.
Permalink Comments off
Check out this video from oblong. Very cool future-is-now operating system.
g-speak overview 1828121108 from john underkoffler on Vimeo.
From mike.
Permalink Comments off